Trade
finance has been a very slowly moving space when it comes to embracing digital
innovations. However, this is now accelerating: developments in the Corporate
Trade space as well as innovations in Capital Markets show game-changing value
propositions for CFOs and treasurers.
Corporates
were first to digitise trade flows
Corporates
started to adopt digital technologies to operate their business-to-business
supply chain activities several decades ago. The use of electronic data
interchange (EDI) links was initially introduced in automotive and retail
industries, and later expanded into manufacturing, healthcare, pharmaceutical,
utility and construction companies. Goal was then to accelerate the
communication with suppliers. Focus was on digitising the corporate-to-corporate
(B2B) information flows such as purchase orders, shipping documents, invoices,
...
During
three decades, the use of electronic communication continued to increase firmly
in the business-to-business (B2B) space and expanded to electronic invoicing
(e-invoicing). Acknowledging the benefits of digital communication, several
governments around the world encouraged, sometimes mandated, over the last 7
years, the use of e-invoicing. This further increased digitisation in the B2B
space involving millions of SMEs through digital platforms.
Some of
the e-invoicing platforms that were launched before the financial crisis of
2008 have become prominent players, such as depicted on Gartner’s Magic Quadrant on Purchase-to-Payment. A plethora of domestic
e-invoicing platforms are now in business and helping corporates of all sizes
digitise invoices, usually focusing on the high-volume national markets.
Whereas
the corporate-to-corporate space was actively moving (and moving fast) towards
digital processes, the corporate-to-bank and bank-to-bank spaces camped safely
on their established paper practices. The only notable development during the
first decade of the 21st century was about banks starting to roll out their own
single-bank portals to address their clients’ needs for online trade finance
services.
Figure 1: The business-to-business
space was the first one to digitize trade flows whilst banking processes continued
to depend on the exchange of paper documentation.
Trade-related
digital innovations have now entered all spaces
Fast forward
to 2017 and the situation is very different as technology has invaded all three
spaces – corporate-to-corporate, corporate-to-bank, and bank-to-bank. And much
more is actually happening but I will expand on that in later sections.
- In the corporate-to-bank space, large
corporates have increasingly adopted multi-banking trade software
solutions. Such offerings help treasurers and trade managers manage all
types of trade finance flows such as demand guarantees, collections,
letters of credit, bank payment obligations and sometimes receivables
financing. Multi-banked corporations operating substantial volumes of
transactional flows are those attracted most by such multi-banking trade
finance offerings. Global Trade Corporation (GTC) is a leader in that space working
also with SWIFT’s multi-banking messaging services (FIN and FileAct) and
trade standards (MT 798)
- On the B2B shipping and logistics side
of the market, a very limited number of platforms (two actually) took on
the challenge to digitise the bill of lading as well as other key shipping
documents and are engaging with a growing number of banks. I am referring
here to essDOCS and Bolero. essDOCS serves 18,000+ clients of all
sizes and located around the world
- The very paper-intensive inter-bank
space has also been attempting to digitise trade flows as the ICC rolled
out eUCP as well as an ISO 20022-based settlement instrument known as the
Bank Payment Obligation (BPO - see reference 1 below). Use of those legal
schemes is still limited to a small number of banks. Banks' appetite for
digitising the bank-to-bank trade flows only started recently and has been
very slow to move along given the legal complexities and IT investments
required. Yet they have proven critical for early adopter banks wishing to
respond to demanding clients. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, BNP Paribas,
TEB, Standard Chartered Bank, UniCredit and Commerzbank have been very
active on the BPO, primarily in the chemicals and car industries.
- In this same
inter-bank space, banks recently piloted the use of blockchain technology
to digitise bank-to-bank trade flows but the few implementations are - at
this stage - limited to glorified trials.
Most of above mentioned innovations succeeded to
transform paper-based information flows into electronic equivalents. When doing
so, counterparties maintain – or slightly adapt - their established legal and
business practices and gradually move information flows to technology-based
processes and software applications. This approach is bringing immediate benefits
in terms of cost efficiency and speed, but it also limits the extent of the
newly proposed value propositions as digital technologies are introduced in
bilateral relationships - without revisiting the full business model.
Among recent product launches, multi-banking online
market places have emerged in both primary and secondary spaces with the aim to
provide superior value propositions by reinventing trade processes.
New avenues to innovate: Online market places offer
superior value propositions
A new way to roll out technology-based business
innovations has recently emerged in trade finance, with a focus on enhanced
interactions and collaboration among transactional parties through common
platforms. They are often referred to as online market places. Some even
describe themselves as exchanges of trade assets. In such centrally managed
services, all players involved in a transaction are connected to and interact
with a central counterparty platform acting as a trusted service provider. This
is offering users a very different experience compared to the previous digitisation
model, where players keep on using bilateral business practices.
The
following picture compares the two models:
Figure 2: Online market places bring
all involved parties together and enable to re-invent trade business processes
The
benefits of such platforms are numerous as their users (also clients) work
collaboratively on an end-to-end transactional workflow. Users are quickly
on-boarded given the limited impact on their internal back office applications.
The initial cost to join such platform is very low as usage-based pricing is
often applied and back-office integration is not required from the start. The
value propositions brought by such platforms are superior to the ones brought
by the digitisation of bilateral interactions. Platform owners define and
operate full business processes and can therefore have stronger control and
value add on the evolution of the transaction (e.g., escrow service, automated
decision making, artificial intelligence checks at transaction level). Such
market places also offer a superior level of added value as they re-invent the
end-to-end business processes. Evolving user needs can be quickly accommodated
as a single software instance needs to be upgraded.
The
following outline compares the key attributes of both innovation models:
Digitising existing bilateral
business interactions
- Bilateral - Institutions digitise bilateral
information exchanges using agreed data structures and business processes
- Software and Standards - Software solutions are developed or
acquired by both institutions and made compatible by using agreed
messaging standards
- Automation at bilateral
level - Business process is improved
incrementally with multi-banking capabilities, automated data aggregation,
STP data flows, …
- Improved bilateral
processes - Increased speed, visibility, efficiency
thanks to paper replaced by digital – however limited to bilateral
relationships
Digitising the end-to-end
business process with online market places
- Multilateral - All involved institutions join a common
platform and participate in transactions based on multilateral rules
- Platform Service - The
central platform manages transactions in a complete and collaborative way
enabling faster time-to-market and service upgrades for all parties
- Innovation at transaction
level - Value
propositions are maximised through auctioning, escrow service, proxy
payment, automated decision making, analytics, artificial intelligence
based checks, …
- Re-invented
transaction-level process - End-to-end business process is
re-invented and offers more value to all participants
As per above comparison, online market places score
better than traditional digitisation models.
In
the corporate-to-bank origination space, new request-for-quotation platforms
recently emerged so as to provide corporates with streamlined access to their
trade finance banks at sourcing level. Two recent multi-bank origination
bidding platforms located in Europe and the Middle East seem to enjoy
successful product launches. I am referring here to Mitigram and Trade Asset Exchange (TAEX). Surely others will follow
suit. Other market places have emerged in the receivables space as well as in
the secondary space, as outlined in the following section.
The
trade ecosystem has also found new avenues to innovate as well as new players
to engage with – I am referring here to institutional investors.
New
players to involve in trade flows: capital market firms
As trade
finance has suffered under the new regulatory requirements imposed on banks,
capital constraints have started to become a priority. Trade banks have
identified the need to position this business as an attractive asset class
towards capital markets, also called the buy-side. This trend was triggered as
post-crisis regulatory requirements increased the cost of capital. Balance
sheet management became a priority for most trade banks and selling down assets
became critical to release regulatory capital, and manage their balance sheet.
Such balance sheet improvements enable banks to originate more transactions and
to provide more funding to their clients.
This
regulatory driven market development has led to a series of innovations aimed
at bridging the trade banks with the asset management firms. Bringing more
liquidity into the trade space was until now possible through various
intermediaries structuring (synthetic) securitisation programmes. It is now
also achievable via specialised market places bridging the trade space to the
wide community of institutional investors.
Two
new platforms are being launched this year to help banks in this respect:
- TrustBills combines
the efficiency benefits of an online market place and the access to
institutional investors. This platform provides a new, cost-effective way for
the buy side to access a highly profitable market with an attractive risk
profile and short-term self-liquidation. TrustBills offers sellers of trade
receivables (unconfirmed or confirmed) several benefits such as speed, pricing
fairness, convenience and KYC/compliance. Since Q2 2016, two German banks - DZ Bank and Deutsche Bank -
have partnered with and invested in this new venture
- Capital and Credit Risk Manager (CCRManager) facilitates the
distribution of trade finance and working capital obligations between
financial institutions. CCRManager is offered to banks, non-bank financial
institutions, and institutional investors only. It helps banks to address
balance sheet (RWA decrease), return on equity and cost challenges. A
total of 16 financial institutions signed up since early 2017.
Conclusion
Digitising trade and trade
finance is a very long journey. Early digitisation attempts in trade have
delivered tangible value to the industry and corporates have been much faster
than banks to realise the benefits, which have mainly been about automating B2B
trading processes.
Whereas the initial digitisation
wave helped the market migrate away from paper-based practices to digital ones,
we now see new online market places through which corporates, banks and
investors can operate transactions collaboratively, using as many streamlined
and automated processes as possible.
We can expect those platforms to
bring superior value propositions as they overhaul business practices and
deliver much more than digitisation. They achieve this by connecting all
parties involved in the end-to-end transaction workflow including new ones such
as insurers and institutional investors and can therefore reinvent trade
finance practices and leapfrog the digitisation objective.